Brussels Privacy Hub has moved to a new website as of 18 May 2022. The new website is available at www.brusselsprivacyhub.com. This version of the website will be stored for archiving purposes. Please see the new website for the latest updates.
WORKSHOP • 4 OCTOBER 2016
by Lina Jasmontaite, Brussels Privacy Hub, LSTS, VUB
On 4 October 2016, as part of the GDPR Workshop series, the Brussels Privacy Hub hosted a workshop on implementation of the EU GDPR and Privacy Impact Assessment. The workshop was divided into two sessions.
The first one consisted of a joint presentation by Rowena Rodrigues and Julia Muraszkewicz from Trilateral Research Ltd., exploring some of the challenges associated to DPIAs. The presentation was based upon two of Trilateral’s research projects: SATORI and iTRACK. The presentation addressed the DPIA related requirements to be found in the GDPR. Among the challenges discussed it put the emphasis upon the need to determine who has the most adequate expertise, what type of impact assessment is most appropriate (e.g., scope, scale), or how to ensure that it is of sufficient quality. It then presented a case-study based on the iTRACK project. It was followed by a Q&A session.
The second part of the workshop consisted in open discussion with the audience. It was chaired and steered by Raphaël Gellert and Niels Van Dijk from VUB-LSTS and the D/PIALAB. Two themes in particular garnered particular attention: the difference between a PIA and a DPIA, and the issue of public participation in DPIA. Concerning the first issue, there seemed to be a consensus concerning the fact that DPIAs are limited to complying with the GDPR. The articulation between complying with GDPR and assessing the risks to the rights and freedoms of the data subjects continued remains unclear to the audience, as is the added value of a DPIA limited to compliance. Concerning the issue of public participation, the discussion highlighted the difficulty of identifying who the relevant public is. Comparisons were made with environmental law, which has a broad scope ratione personae (i.e., it can extend to all concerned persons, not only affected persons). There was also some important discussion on the scope ratione materiae of this provision, i.e., to which processing operations should it apply? It seems further guidance from the EDPB will be needed to define the high risk processing operations where such participation is seen as appropriate.
For more information about upcoming BPH events, please visit the BPH website or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Keep up to date of our activities and developments. Sign up to our newsletter:
Copyright © Brussels Privacy Hub