As Brussels Privacy Hub, one of our main objectives is to create a network of leading thinkers, coming from around the world and having different backgrounds, to foster an interchange of ideas with the ultimate goal to produce high quality privacy research. That is why, in 2017, the Brussels Privacy Hub launched the “Meet the Author Series”.
The concept at the basis of these lunchtime debates is to give authors of recent books and articles on privacy related issues the opportunity to present their works before a critical audience composed by academics, private sector practitioners, policymakers, fundamental rights advocates, European officials and so on.
The series hosts both experienced and leading thinkers, as well as younger scholars who wrote distinguished papers. Normally, we invite as discussants two famous experts in the field, one with a background in academia and one with a background as practitioner. They will give their review, which is followed by a reaction of the author. We end with a Q&A with the public on crucial questions.
Hereafter, a list of our “Meet the Author” events. Videos and summaries are available to ensure that those who could not attend are informed on the key points of the debates. The series is an initiative of Dr Hielke Hijmans of the Hub, who also chairs the debates.
To be announced
25 June 2019
Author: Dr. Jef Ausloos (KU Leuven/University of Amsterdam)
Critical remarks by Meg Leta Jones (Georgetown University) and Thomas Zerdick (EDPS)
Introduction: The thesis investigates the role of individual empowerment over personal data in countering power asymmetries online. This dissertation’s aim is to dissect ‘data empowerment’ in the information society through the lens of the right to erasure in Article 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The conclusion is positive: the GDPR’s right to erasure does play a meaningful role.
17 December 2018
Author: Dr. Philipp Hacker (Humboldt University of Berlin / WZB Berlin Social Science Center)
Critical remarks by Paul Nemitz (European Commission) and Prof. Gloria González Fuster (Brussels Privacy Hub / LSTS)
Introduction: The article discusses the impact of artificial intelligence applications for EU anti-discrimination law which may struggle to adequately capture algorithmic decision making, suggesting an integrated vision of anti-discrimination and data protection law to enforce fairness in the digital age. The GDPR toolkit, with independent data protection authorities and specific tools like a data protection impact assessment, could play an important role here.
26 June 2018
Author: Prof. Graham Greenleaf (University of New South Wales, Australia)
Critical remarks by Fabian Delcros (DG JUST) and Prof. Christopher Kuner (Brussels Privacy Hub)
Introduction: The EU is negotiating with Japan and South Korea on adequacy, and this includes the compatibility of the concept of adequacy with the APEC’s Cross-border Privacy Rules (CBPRs) and its implementation in law. The articles ask whether, and under what circumstances, the APEC’s Cross-border Privacy Rules (CBPRs) could be an existential threat to EU adequacy.
18 December 2017
Critical remarks by Prof. Gloria González Fuster (Brussels Privacy Hub / LSTS) and Christian D’Cunha (EDPS)
Introduction: The article argues that the interplay of data protection law and consumer protection law provides exciting opportunities for a more integrated vision on “data consumer law”.
27 March 2019
Author: Juraj Sajfert (European Commission, DG JUST) and Teresa Quintel (Luxembourg University/Uppsala Universitet)
Critical remarks by Prof. Gert Vermeulen (Ghent University) and Cecilia Verkleij (European Commission, DG HOME)
Introduction: Directive (EU) 2016/680 covers an important area. Firstly, an increased number of criminal acts is being committed online or with the help of online tools. Secondly, as perpetrators are becoming more tech-savvy, LEAs turned to new investigative techniques, including big data analytics. Thirdly, EU rules (both the patchwork of data protection rules adopted under the former third pillar and the rules for EU Justice and Home Affairs Agencies) on the processing of personal data by LEAs are profoundly changed.
The paper gives a good overview of the main particularities of data protection in the area of police and justice by law enforcement agencies (LEAs), focusing on four focal points: profiling, indirect exercise of data subject rights, logs, international transfers.
7 November 2018
Author: Dr. Mistale Taylor (Utrecht University)
Doctoral thesis: “Transatlantic Jurisdictional Conflicts in Data Protection Law: How the Fundamental Right to Data Protection Conditions the European Union’s Exercise of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction”
Critical remarks by Anna Buchta (EDPS) and Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius (LSTS / University of Amsterdam)
Introduction: The thesis examines the opportunities and limitations for the EU to exercise jurisdiction extraterritorially to safeguard data subjects’ fundamental right to data protection. In so doing unilaterally, the EU has been championing a value and fundamental right for its data subjects. This has inspired jurisdictional conflicts with – most notably - the US. The author claims that if the EU’s reach were strong enough to avoid or counter resistance, this would ultimately lead to fewer conflicts in jurisdiction as global standards would converge and, even in the EU-US data privacy law interface, commonalities and shared approaches to rights protection would emerge.
20 April 2018
Author: Dr. Maja Brkan (Maastricht University)
Critical remarks by Dr. Herke Kranenborg (Commission Legal Service) and Prof. Christopher Kuner (Brussels Privacy Hub)
Introduction: The article aims to shed light on the notion of essence of fundamental rights that has been relied upon by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in the Schrems and Digital Rights Ireland cases. The article places the notion of essence into the framework of multi-level protection of fundamental rights in Europe, arguing that this concept has its origins not only in case law of the CJEU concerning the ‘very substance’ of fundamental rights, but also in the national constitutional traditions of Member States and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. This article further elaborates on the constitutive elements of this notion and proposes a classification of the different types of breaches of the essence of fundamental rights. Finally, while elaborating on the relationship between the notion of essence and the principle of proportionality, this article proposes an EU methodology for determining a breach of the essence of a fundamental right.
20 September 2017
Author: Dr. Hielke Hijmans (Brussels Privacy Hub / LSTS)
Critical remarks by Dr. Orla Lynskey (London School of Economics) and Christopher Docksey (former Director EDPS)
Introduction: This book examines the role of the EU in ensuring privacy and data protection on the internet and shows that EU powers can be successfully used in a legitimate and effective manner and that this subject could be a success story for the EU, in times of widespread Euroscepticism.
Keep up to date of our activities and developments. Sign up to our newsletter:
Copyright © Brussels Privacy Hub